ࡱ> q` FNbjbjqPqP .::8F 2228J2D2]h~3(3333444C]E]E]E]E]E]E]$L_hai]74477i]334~]*;;;733C];7C];;%WY3r3 h":2u9W7\ ]<] X:b]::b4YY^:bZL4^5^;5L6444i]i]!;p444]7777%)d) PPD Impact evaluation  INCLUDEPICTURE "cid:image001.gif@01C679BB.EFFA4780" \* MERGEFORMATINET summary report Introduction PPD criterion 7 states that providers should: Provide specified management information and include an evaluation of the programmes impact on practice in schools. Gather operational data, and monitor and evaluate the programmes impact on practice in schools. This information is required by TDA by 30 November 2006. The evaluation of the programmes impact on practice in schools should be sent in summary form using this template. PPD partnerships have already specified their approach to impact evaluation in their application. Please note that TDA welcomes different approaches across the partnerships. The purposes of this summary template are as follows: To support providers and ensure that the process of reporting is not unduly burdensome To achieve consistency in how this information is reported To enable TDA to disseminate effective practice across providers To signal areas which would benefit from further research and consideration To inform the future development of the PPD programme We are interested in how you have evaluated impact, what conclusions it has led to and how it will inform your future provision. Please note that these summaries will be made available for the external quality assurance of PPD that we are commissioning. However, we will not use this information to make judgements which affect existing funding arrangements. Guidance All references to objectives refer to the objectives identified in the orginal application. Please note that providers will not be penalised if certain objectives have not been met in full. The boxes will expand if additional space is needed. However, we would urge providers to be as concise as possible. We are interested, for the purposes of this summary report, in headline information rather than in the detail which lies behind the findings. Please note, however, that the external quality assurance of the programme may involve further discussion based around the evidence which supports providers evaluation of impact at some point in the next two years. Provider name: St. Marys College MA in Education (Continuing Professional Development) Q1: How well are you achieving the objectives as identified in your application? Prompts Have you addressed pupil learning experiences? What evidence do you have to support this judgement? How did you collect and analyse the evidence? Whom did you consult?  Our programme is premised on improving teaching and learning in individual schools. Whilst it is too early to state quantitatively that there have been improvements in pupils curricular grades or achievements, feedback from teachers, CPD co-ordinators, senior management and school governors indicates strongly that pupils learning experiences within the curriculum have been enhanced; and there have been noted increases in pupils capacity to learn in different subjects. All individual research projects are linked to the School Improvement Plan and must be counter-signed by the school on a proforma (see appendix 1). One of the key expectations on this proforma is that research must be linked to improving teaching and learning in the school. The evidence to support the judgement relating to increases in pupils capacity to learn was collected from the following sources: module evaluations (data collected from individual teachers - see appendix 2 for example of form) - questionnaires (data drawn from sample of teacher participants - see appendix 3 for example) - interviews (data drawn from sample of teacher participants - see appendix 4 for example) - quality assurance (data from evaluations of teaching across school monitoring sites - see appendix 5 for example of form) - minutes of stakeholders meetings All stakeholders including teacher participants, CPD co-ordinators, headteachers, governors are consulted. We are in the process of expanding this to include a representative sample of pupils responses in teacher participants schools.  Q2: How far were your original objectives realistic? Prompts What evidence do you have to support this judgement? How was this evidence collected and analysed?  Early indications are that our original key objective (to improve the knowledge, understanding and practice of teachers for the purpose of improving pupils performance) has been realistic. This is supported by both the increased number of individual students on roll and the number of school centres that have signed up to the programme (see appendix 6). Evidence drawn from analysis of interview data with a sample of teacher participants shows that: in subject delivery, more practical activities are being used and more investigative and focused activities are being undertaken which are more open-ended. A personalised learning agenda is being developed for pupils in classrooms; sustaining continuing professional work over time has enabled teachers to embed new practices relating particularly to pupils learning; collaboration in teams both within schools and across schools (networks) has increased momentum in reflective enquiry and is helping schools build social and intellectual capital. There are noted increases in teacher participants self confidence motivation and awareness of themselves as learners and a greater focus on improving pupils capacity to learn in the classroom. Schools have responded positively to programme provision and in six cases they have put through a second cohort of students for MA study. Interview data with teacher participants also indicates that schools are amending their policies on specific aspects of teaching and learning and implementing the proposals made by teacher researchers.  Q3: Has your evaluation led to any reprioritisation of your objectives? Prompts Are all your objectives ongoing? Have certain objectives become more significant and others less so? How and on what basis have these decisions been reached?  Whilst our key objectives are on-going we have made a number of significant amendments to programme design and philosophy. The focus continues to be on research to improve pupils and students learning outcomes in the curriculum. However, a new thrust has been given to researching practice to increase pupils learning capacity within the curriculum. This embraces a more practical implementation of research enquiry, linked closely to subject pedagogy and the professional needs of teacher participants. A newly validated MA in Education programme (Leading Innovation and Change) has been designed to address the change and learning agendas of individual schools and to embed PPD in the real work of teachers pedagogy and to empower teachers to lead change in their pedagogical practice. Priorities have been readjusted to accommodate the view that the ability to research practice, engage in dialogue with all members of a school community, and lead change which addresses their curriculum concerns constitutes a highly significant impact on learning, both for course participants and pupils in their change. Priorities include re-focusing on: subject knowledge and pedagogy, for improving pupils capacity to learn; teacher leadership, for increased capacity to initiate and lead change; school culture, for identifying levels of professional dialogue throughout the school and improve institutional literacy. These adjustments have been made as a direct result of feedback and data analysis gained by interview and questionnaire with sample groups of teacher participants (for instruments see appendix 3 and 4). Managing the change agendas for schools, particularly in respect of subject knowledge and pedagogy, has therefore take on a new force in our programmes.  Q4: Are there areas of impact that you did not originally anticipate? Prompts What evidence do you have to support this judgement? How did you collect and analyse this evidence?  There are a number of areas of impact that we did not anticipate. The most prominent is the empowerment of the individual teacher. By having a critical mass of teachers studying in individual schools a culture of enquiry, challenge and change has started to emerge. In addition, as more of their proposals are being incorporated in school policy, teacher participants are becoming more confident in advocating and defending their claims to new knowledge. New theories of action are being disseminated both within individual schools, and beyond them in school networks. This is an unforeseen outcome. Teachers (with new confidence) have been pro-active in this respect. For example, two MA finalists (a headteacher of a primary school and a colleague teacher of a Year 5 class) were observed presenting their research work on developing a learning culture throughout the school. They directed their talk to an audience of invited guests (after school twilight period). These included colleagues from the participants own school and also teachers from neighbouring schools who operated within an established school network. Evidence for the above observation came from visits by programme team members to individual school sites, and analysis of interview data with sample teacher groups. The evidence suggests that by engaging in this level of professional inquiry and also by disseminating key outcomes to professional audiences teachers not only empower themselves but also re-define their professionalism. Another unforeseen reported outcome is that as a result of engaging in PPD, teachers are better able to design information - gathering instruments, to gain and interrogate school data and form baselines in areas that are difficult to measure, such as pupils learning disposition and perceptions of learning. A shift in emphasis has taken place in sample schools from teaching to learning. Evidence: Interviews with teacher participants and in students presentations at our Autumn Conference (Appendix 7). Teachers practice in sample schools has been modified to enable pupils to identify their own strengths and weaknesses in their work and empowering them to take more control of their own learning. Teaching in sample schools has become more interactive allowing for more practical application of work in the core subjects. The MA work has allowed teachers to find a way of measuring more abstract learning. (e.g. learning capacity, learning disposition, connectedness and valuing and working with difference - more difficult to quantify than traditional indicators.) Evidence for this came from a primary school head who reported: We are a very high achieving school but with little scope for value-added as we have a very high performing infants school with the majority of children coming in at level 3 so we have nowhere to take them. This puts immense pressure on us to achieve and we have to look at other ways of making that achievement which requires thinking out of the box. The MA has provided us with the creative and critical thinking skills to enable us (the senior management team) to do that. Undergraduate and post-graduate ITE students are beginning to realise the importance of obtaining M level credits and value the opportunity to develop their professionalism through research enquiry linked to practice. However, post-graduate ITE students have particular learning requirements and need to engage initially in readings which do not assume prior knowledge of teaching. Initially, we have found it important for them to clarify values, professional identity, learning styles and the essence of reflective practice before they move on to specific work relating to pedagogy and the curriculum. Additional examples of unanticipated outcomes include: a shift in culture and capacity of schools in which teacher participants are able to confidently lead change initiatives linked to pedagogy; a noted increase in teachers theoretical knowledge; research work contributing to whole school developments; more creative pedagogical approaches linked to pupils disposition, learning capacity, meta-cognition and attainment. Evidence for the above has come from discussion with a sample of teacher participants, CPD co-ordinators, questionnaires with participants and from individual PGCE students in a pilot group.  Q5: What is changing about your provision as a result of your evaluation? What evidence do you have to support this judgement? How did you collect and analyse the evidence? What changes have you made/are you making to the way your consortium functions? Note that you may wish to attach an action plan as part of your answer to this question.  As a result of our on-going evaluations we have made a number of changes to our three MA in Education Programmes (see appendix 8). From September 2006 a small group of PGCE Primary students was established in order to provide students with an opportunity to undertake 60 credits of M level work through our MA programme Continuing Professional Development, as part of their PGCE studies. Plans are in hand for us to offer this facility to all our PGCE primary and secondary students from September 2007, taking account of findings from student experiences within the current pilot group. Plans are in hand to also offer all our primary and secondary ITT undergraduate students 60 credits of M level work from September 2007. Currently we have a small student cohort in each category completing M level credits. In addition, we have designed 3 modules on teacher mentoring, linked to our MA in Education Programme: Leading Innovation and Change. These provide access to the programme for class teacher mentors and we hope to offer the modules to mentors from September 2007 as a lead into M level studies. We plan to offer our MA programme: Leading, Innovation and Change to newly qualified teachers from a range of London Boroughs from September 2007. NQTs will be able to take up the programme, initially registering for 60 credits and work at a pace that suits their needs. We have appointed a Quality Assurance Manager who has responsibility for collecting and analysing data from a variety of sources, particularly from observation of teaching sessions and evaluation of assessment practices across student cohorts. Data is fed back to the management team for analysis and action-planning. We are also in the process of conducting a longitudinal enquiry into the long term impact of teacher research and the teacher as a change agent. This is expected to provide us with rich data about impact of provision from a variety of relevant sources and upon which action can be taken. The development of teaching notes and instructional guidance notes on Web CT for dissemination with our students is already underway and will provide teacher participants with more flexibility in their learning and increase the dialogue between teachers and learners at strategic times during the programme. The provision of our MA programmes in distance learning format is another initiative planned to develop strongly from September 2007. This will provide students with increased flexibility to pursue their studies on a national basis. A greater focus will be placed on leadership for learning in programme content in future. The thrust will be on pedagogy and in seeking ways to expand pupils capacity to learn through different subjects. Our research indicates the benefits of schools building up professional learning communities in which teachers share their practice, focused on improving pupils learning capacity. Indications are that developing a community of practice with this focus may be the single most important way in which to improve a school and the pupils attainment levels. Our research indicates that the CPD Co-ordinator is a major driver of M level research activity in the school and plays a key role in supporting students learning. We intend to make increased use of the CPD co-ordinator for the purpose of training and development activities and recruiting second cohorts of students in existing schools. Data evidence for the above decisions has come from interviews with a sample of participants, TDA information, UCET information, minutes of stakeholder meetings, programme board minutes, discussions with L.A.s and external examiners.  Q6: Please provide a summary of the activities that collaborative funding has supported. How effective do you feel these activities have been in promoting partnership and collaboration?  Collaborative funding has enabled us to deliver our programme across a range of school centres. These have included centres in socially and economically disadvantaged areas. Some schools in special measures have untilised our programme as a means of promoting teacher professionalism. The funding has enabled us to keep our fees at market rates and reach a much wider market overall than would otherwise have been the case. Funding has assisted us in formalising our structures and systems and in developing monitoring procedures. It has enabled provision to be co-ordinated by a School Partnerships Manager. We have therefore been able to network widely and offer good learning support to students in school clusters.  Thank you for completing this evaluation form please return it electronically to:  HYPERLINK "mailto:ppd@tda.gov.uk" ppd@tda.gov.uk Or by post to: Angharad Jones PPD programme officer Training and Development Agency (TDA) for Schools 151 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 9SS     adrst   d    Z[v𽳨||qqqfh6OJQJ^JhS6OJQJ^Jh46OJQJ^Jh 6OJQJ^JhJ5OJQJ^JhB>%5OJQJ^JhKy6OJQJ^JhKyOJQJ^JhKy5OJQJ^J"hKyCJOJQJ^JaJnH tH +jhKyCJOJQJU^JaJnH tH hKy5CJ(OJQJ^JaJ(%st 9 : ! x F & FEƀ{&8NENx @ q*F & FEƀ{&F & FEƀ{&F & FEƀ{&@ v w  $IfF & FEƀ{&   \d>K & F$Eƀ{&If $$Ifa$$IfekdF!$$Ifl#F$ t0644 la iK & F$Eƀ{&IfK & F$Eƀ{&IfK & F$Eƀ{&If  xhx\x\ $$Ifa$gd $$If`a$gd $ & F$Ifa$gd $Ifgkd!$$Ifl#H$ t0H$644 la $$Ifa$ [67 $$If^a$gdsfO$ & F$Ifa$gdsfO$$If^a$gd $ & F $Ifa$gd ',47C  M]Dd齳|qfqqh=6OJQJ^JhZ6OJQJ^Jh6OJQJ^Jh)z6OJQJ^Jh8w46OJQJ^JhKy6OJQJ^JhKy5OJQJ^JhKyOJQJ^JhsfO6OJQJ^Jh6OJQJ^Jh=6OJQJ^Jh46OJQJ^JhS6OJQJ^JhO6OJQJ^J(EM4K & F$Eƀ{&If $$Ifa$ $  $Ifa$ikd9"$$Ifl*#H$ t0H$644 la|p`P$$If^a$gd=(<$ & F$Ifa$gd=(< $$Ifa$gd=(<$Ifikd"$$IflP#H$ t0H$644 la $Ifgd8w4 & F$If{|efhi$If$$If^a$gd=(<$ & F$Ifa$gd=(< $$Ifa$gd=(<$$If^a$gd=(<$ & F $Ifa$gd=(<$$If^a$gd=(<BCFgh ;!=!""####$$$%%!%"%}r}}g}\}\hxV6OJQJ^Jh996OJQJ^Jhn6OJQJ^Jh?E6OJQJ^Jh=(<6OJQJ^JhKy5OJQJ^Jh8w4OJQJ^JhKyOJQJ^Jh8w46OJQJ^JhKy6OJQJ^Jh~6OJQJ^Jh=6OJQJ^JhO6OJQJ^Jh)z6OJQJ^Jh A?6OJQJ^J$  $$Ifa$ikd9#$$Ifl3#H$ t0H$644 la @ 9gkd#$$Ifl(## t0644 la $$Ifa$K & F$Eƀ{&If & F$If &>'>(>4>5>>>??(@G@T@U@WAcAӽ~s~ssshhhx`6OJQJ^Jhk66OJQJ^Jh{6OJQJ^Jh6OJQJ^JhKy5OJQJ^Jh*&OJQJ^Jh J:OJQJ^JhKyOJQJ^JhKy6OJQJ^Jh\6OJQJ^Jh\6OJQJ^JhR36OJQJ^Jh]I6OJQJ^Jh 6OJQJ^J(999999999999999 $$Ifa$ikd1%$$IflF2## t0644 la9:I::iK & F$Eƀ{&IfK & F$Eƀ{&IfK & F$Eƀ{&If:::::x;y;C=D=(>xo_Sx $$Ifa$gd$$If^a$gd $Ifgd$ & F$Ifa$gdgkd%$$Ifl(## t0644 la $$Ifa$$If (>)>R?S?c@d@AABBCCD{ $$Ifa$gdK+$ & F$Ifa$gdK+$h$If^ha$gdK+ $$Ifa$gd%$$If^a$gd$ & F$Ifa$gdk6 $$Ifa$gd$ & F$Ifa$gd$h$If^ha$gd cAdAeAAA?BTBBBCSCCCCCDDDDGGoHHH\I^I_I`IcIrIsIuII/J1J2JaKKKNL M MMMMȽӽ޲{{p{hx)*6OJQJ^Jh-_6OJQJ^Jh6OJQJ^JhKy5OJQJ^Jh 'h6hKyhKyOJQJ^JhKy6OJQJ^Jh4S6OJQJ^Jh '6OJQJ^JhK+6OJQJ^Jh6OJQJ^Jh{6OJQJ^Jhk66OJQJ^J,DDGGoHpH[I\I]I^I_I$If$h$If^ha$gd$$If^a$gd$h$If^ha$gdK+ $$Ifa$gdK+$ & F$Ifa$gd4S$ & F$Ifa$gdK+ $$Ifa$gd ' _I`IaIbIcIdIeIfIgIhIiIjIkIlImInIoIpIikd-&$$Ifl=(## t0644 lapIqIrIsItIuII/J0J1J2JTK|l$ & F$Ifa$gdgkd&$$Ifl(## t0644 la$If & F$If $$Ifa$ TKUKVKKK M M MMMMMMMMMMMMMM$If$ & F$Ifa$gd-_$h$If^ha$gd-_$ & F$Ifa$gd$h$If^ha$gdMMMMMMMMM N'N.N7N8N:N;N=N>Nikd)'$$Ifl=(## t0644 laMMoMpMMMMMMM8N9N;NN?NANBNENFN񷯫h))jh))UhKyOJQJ^JhKy0J5OJQJ^J$j'hKy5OJQJU^JjhKy5OJQJU^JhKy5OJQJ^JhKy>N@NANCNDNENFN,1h. A!"#7$% F!DdX } rV  S 2Aimage001b \l毑{+sx Dnp \l毑{+sPNG  IHDR(tEXtSoftwareMicrosoft Office5qPLTE    333***&&&""";;;$$$...???777,,, 111(((UUUDDDLLLHHH]]]@@@fffwwwnnnYtRNS@f pHYs@@bCc[ cmPPJCmp0712HsIDATx^]m{&MKH;L\ٙ{{tK~$- #˒,K-GS^Nhm?E 6Tj!zo^˟[!΄EgUiMRw]fqkI{IW4>O(8[n-Hr6uYuZ."mS7M$:}_\ȦU3 X>_JE5UP,/4T#̙L7(cG]u7i7;&D'Dş-9гn}MdIYU\_Us3cF=$m*b!(JN*gqJ3Fke*cw8%2NM].$PG4ωk,l~lY)OZ<)XMUɂXDCyU>,.eBv%JCmec{5+F;6Zb\/6iV)Y@_XW)*]X<$-$IIJ^*gJYjcD?92˫z;|miП z,tR}KײN A߽>4 ߟ #u ˷)ӣ5} }=]k$ mpdeXof6h:Fw̸p2wS7p]r;wW%*/褃z8ewBz%{?: -]C>EE24spg6}vhHr6TprTf9N)oN%w,Iχq7X՛)ukq~.zC\ŀwvz<ވo5,7J*leKZb~CeU]IN8_﫡LʓKy_=η M6|N?.4z/`Dg_^NGT}^zHDlؕ1|HJU$SӉdˌ|<;OGy wpA,Xu%6;7N½Kv*K)^ hc]K?澬N4z=MYIV_j2.áHh XǖnҪֵQ P(KCw" <˺~h"/q=$ЊP+AV \ޘ,*((`&&ZY8 Sv]n8MM棟,l[}nRSNZZ(`sp ~aXG;UܯZRDT5{gmcZjWezDYq\X@v]]> Ykq?+Y%z袀Qe%JxȧuLX6-ZZ6'ޱe[ }poZ5ʒ96-{V˥#(a}ۥ|`C <[0(ۥ+^Ӱ>wMb<8!.TFy&藠:%Cw%"wN/>^)Y:r^U% ӏaN©X8 eURS~Ρ*z1c>$Ce\uԎrX:'ӴH4U\?V|F鷍P&*d]Gp^JNT+ARo@vM.ED(^a=O!{7Xu2"䟕Ȧig 5` J0AK %GOe75of.<4ups:]Ln.nA[o@{2bm T}'>SW)@ߦ'q*h4+ H+pDMSu%ZAzBt\˦}! O:!Q=UGY {E)(兡H ))'pS3Jzga VyK~g5 KV2@7h##j1߁ Rj6 DSEU9nAH.M]JE^F0j5-ޕ( 1Qt {Am= 2cK+<ĝj#5JwYnٳ). e_imP!g-ܞ wAQAP^@RZWs#30?ʸ $v.p+[Nnhhz`bj`xS[+U< K JNN (x#?8>3\g^H!&uF?xTv k]:Aj~Lu\A"7 kH~K-AIn`|hE#|ctA* B6K%;(!4:7ά{-a?E3pn4 ^'(?HS=.RI %bZZzEMEAtGw ~RiybhħOd@#ZKHK7nB E#jE7(vv!<Ƞx@wE^(6Ԕ U.5p=k^HLnSz=v#JyFa~FlC64̘%n+(J$]wjOՖ2š E#T g>c`q]p#(F)/pWQy0݀l7C aFF4aZC"Ӷt]2Gs6;DPR8`rBɹ#(%ɺeckǞy'd9y:g!s[NܥA4 gJ`e݃K0GIR2 wX T 2=F}Sm]8k[-*j/߰,KX I (9$% 48-@oO0(e:BQr Tډ{X9Z%)(s7-9@jAQЄ5 #DP35U س[$T﬍gsAPb.mHP$7J@⾠X3BJc<ȉ#zy="J}'CQA}FQ yifQj?k˔燎ΌYJQlT,(j"[$a'1ܙ=E_1_Pl׼ Gq ϫ9(=FQ ^N:4 StD/%U6IQ[Bȉb1.4jr;<8in,Ljr]lWP$-؛lv}]+v۾3q{ C-(=+7cYoǀL jق"AsYi0q u3 aR#2 z@a#^u^#29a,\P$d)bgBS0̛_g^p2z2\ɪ"hـ77(,[]nn>8>sm|kvOEZ6]ƋEnQ,bYcw]1E67R6hԺ?%}ӝS'ºˈzhχoVn(K+P^a'(&k`=i>rnhQxǓs=fAܐOPF ")^``R o'(CDǻf>PPFѹ~F|CmՔy)L:Qo2b| B#œVZu 6y%.QѦw9"Xuq_iRzf}`!b?ly`jy*ӣji.8Q1{(Y,us |Pmr3bI窴1T#͓8A(5€wg+jzHEWs/7gRr/bK%8bc7:ja\AԪ@m~[bkgJ]*Zԁ4SyX=)vǍA)[iRy,X JWG\Rkײ}e>6~@% 2{J3c#.l0W@ϑ> d٧5M0|VOQey.[LNYg `[9 ((݇K)oKmnmM>yCF/g塺;nYCb< MPud˾()A 7im_.Κ/$16 8_YR>纚gi!:y|3ǽ"̚8-JqٹJa 0~(t+ەG.C_T- ٰҩGK#`5 QTpa&Jpc&Faz9ӐQXt? D^–pY@)4Q\[h|bWgN—1oFQ[:4Ϟm8`2P}&2Ҳ\-ylz{BKqb;ܚ.oz}6@f{mGZ(Fq&ȬlonZ?xlЮ uY?4 pCTW +U,5o x&!M8=h5 0K"xڂ`[kQ$-,\zٷ0ߵ&^?$_)ԉ.P1'1]tWŕ8Y+ |z<РRp=3Fv[;J>KFnXbמFa+m6!/ ÃKsGPFaȃ8 KFQ<C>?5B=Y2wF% xMлEQxLŜUwi(D1p$H(xxQBg6TJyFXo Zl-@A 9lQV@ƆȌ /;5HEyZ&v2U*$t$c">yP㫬?Ӳؗ *AQ~[i.3rdN}QkfYq׍g/auEK69[5 _+7; t:݉FN%J!O2D {SQ_vj+mk# (zV:ZjuOsOGܫ$N?ζ<#1p).J2Za4SqweXa"^0 0L/6Ob>dT]oA>k Ĵü7"T)!EЙE"|bՓ V(ܥ*eVC(jy&R4FR)ww@^;Jǧ/Q9%~ ށ4I7?Lihʗdek:Ek$ŖN wSqe>t˻H&\$\XvJ:A C+y|DRn;{ rѾ#&*U,7@ 2+v]Gf̺Ӳw laJQ-vVε|_ lhΜܷڎr_g -pƧ7x1e.Z;q";;`Kpr,dBq?TNR$.aZy+*mSqnzP +DA MnȌc^@u?D'W2Ds6M9ٗW­_^kVǣ@+ֽu<V @+cB9(Sm۹u+[(Cǿ/\W=׫"agDIENDB`u$$If!vh5F$#vF$:V l t065F$z$$If!vh5H$#vH$:V l t0H$65H$~$$If!vh5H$#vH$:V l* t0H$65H$~$$If!vh5H$#vH$:V lP t0H$65H$~$$If!vh5H$#vH$:V l3 t0H$65H$z$$If!vh5##v#:V l t065#z$$If!vh5##v#:V l t065#~$$If!vh5##v#:V lE t065#~$$If!vh5##v#:V lF t065#z$$If!vh5##v#:V l t065#~$$If!vh5##v#:V l= t065#z$$If!vh5##v#:V l t065#~$$If!vh5##v#:V l= t065#DyK ppd@tda.gov.ukyK ,mailto:ppd@tda.gov.uk@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k(No List 4@4 Header  !4 @4 Footer  !HH  Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ6U@!6  Hyperlink >*B*phFFst9: !x@vw \ d     [67 EM{|efhi@<="#FGTU ! B q r s t u !!$$d&e&''b(c(()))**,,--!/"/Y/Z///00W0X00011111111111111112I222222x3y3C5D5(6)6R7S7c8d899::;;<<??o@p@[A\A]A^A_A`AaAbAcAdAeAfAgAhAiAjAkAlAmAnAoApAqArAsAtAuAA/B0B1B2BTCUCVCCC E E EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE F'F.F7F8F:F;F=F>F@FAFCFDFGF00000000000000 0 0 0 0 0000000000000 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0,000 00 00 00 0,0 0,000 0 000000000000000 0 0 00 0 00 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0 00000 0 0 0 0 00 0000 00 0000 00 0000 0000 00 00 00 00 0000 0 0000000000000 0 0 000 0 0 0000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0000 0 0000 0 0000000000000000000000 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 000000000000000 0 000000000000@0I00@0I00@0I00@0I00I00H  TU !r s $',,--!/"/011122y3C5D5(6)6c8d899::[A\A]A^A_A`A0B1B2BUCVCCC E E EEEEEEGF{00T 0J{00@T{00{00 0J{00 0J {00 Hy00{0 0 y0 0y0 0{0 0y0 0{0 0{0 00 {00x0{00{00{00{00{00y00y00@0@0@0{00x@0 {00\0{00 Ly00y00@0y00{0$0y0$0{0'0 @0{0*0 y0*0@0@0@0{00y00\@0 {0304@0y050{060 y060y080 y080 @0@0@0@0@0@0{05060 0 "%-8cAMFN(159=@EKx @   !' (u((1Y799:(>D_IpITKM>NFN)+,-./0234678:;<>?ABCDFGHIJLEN*acoEEEFFCX@  @ 0(  B S  ?H0(   %}U&} '}4h(}?)}=*}ݰ+},}w-} l77 ; ; F F'F'FGF77;;&F&F-F-FGFh*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags:*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet;*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddressV *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/ c   Qi9:+%@IJMNv9R\^ijuv CCoEEEEEE7F8F8F:F:F;F;F=F>F@FAFCFDFGFqz|~""E%K%)*X0\088EoEEE7F8F8F:F:F;F;F=F>F@FAFCFDFGF3333333333\ d  [7 22oEE7F8F8F:F:F;F;F=F>F@FAFCFDFGF oEE7F8F8F:F:F;F;F=F>F@FAFCFDFGF r9Ov>x+7r_+x.X@kjQF Y(KN#s0n>An>#I>snhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`OJQJo(h  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh 88^8`OJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(88^8`OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo  ^ `OJQJo(hH  ^ `OJQJo(hHxx^x`OJQJ^Jo(hHoHH^H`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh pp^p`OJQJo(h @ @ ^@ `OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(h ^`OJQJo(oh PP^P`OJQJo(hhh^h`OJQJo(hHh 88^8`OJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh 88^8`OJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh 88^8`OJQJo(h^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hH I>s@r9Y(KAns0n>x+QF_+                            ^г                                                              L+ 0J HW%|!V"v=$1L+ - 1"v=1k2%|w"7- 1NH%*&I' 'x)*%+K+@|/48w4f!699: J:wg:?<=(<&? A??E]IsfOS.S4S-_x`-enoKo_uiy)z{~xdR3rZ&n=6_ ZDJxVh k6 EMG\+=%=] \{OfuKy\Z  r s 11122_A`AuA0B1BEEGF@lFFP@Unknown angharadjGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial5& zaTahoma;Wingdings?5 z Courier New"1hff z ;#z ;#"74dFF2QHP?Ky2 Summary Impact Evaluation Reportcdf1 Windows XP4         Oh+'0 $0 P \ h t$Summary Impact Evaluation Reportcdf1Normal Windows XP2Microsoft Office Word@F#@vӆ @Dp":@Dp":z ;՜.+,D՜.+,t0 hp  ,Canterbury Christ Church University College#F !Summary Impact Evaluation Report Title(X` _PID_HLINKS_NewReviewCycleAdqmailto:ppd@tda.gov.ukk   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FPL":Data Nh(1TablecnbWordDocument.SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q